Before & After Gallery
Tear Repair of Skins with Minimal Access to their Back:
The Treatment of a Kayak


Tear repair treatments for ethnographic skins may consist of backing and/or filling of the skins. Backing can also help in the realignment of tears with planar distortions, that is, torn skins which have either lip of the tear higher or lower than the original intended surface. A major obstacle to the treatment occurs, however, if there is minimal or no access to the inner side of the skin to be repaired: backing, clamping, filling or realignment are complicated by this restriction of access. This can be exhibited in skin composite objects which are structurally conceived to surround or contain something, such as carriages, floats, trunks and kayaks.
Seal skins on a kayak which exhibited this problem of limited access were treated a few years ago at the Canadian Conservation Institute. The kayak from the Canadian Museum of Civilization was of the Eastern Canadian type and had been collected by Ernest W. Hawkes in 1914 at Cape Wolstenholme, in northern Québec2,3 (fig. 1). It was in stable condition: the wooden frame was sound and the seal skins were fairly flexible, but had shrunk and torn. Four recent tears and nineteen older tears were present, several of which were disfigured by old tape repairs. In many cases, the skin on either side of the tears were planarly distorted. Except for three tears near the kayak's manhole, the back side of the torn skins were unaccessible. It was judged necessary to repair the tears in the skin covering in order to give the public a better appreciation of the kayak's original appearance and construction.
Four methods of repair were used. These methods were as follows:
(1) If the skins were not planarly distorted,
the tears were repaired by filling, using of a fill
material which was thick enough to adhere to the skin
edges of the tears without the use of a backing. A paste
was made of 1 part by weight of paper pulp to 8 parts
by weight of 2% w/v BDH methylcellulose of low substitution
in water. The water coming in contact with the skin
was minimized by blotting the excess water in the paste
before application. Because the paste, when wet, adhered
poorly to the skin, the fills were built up in stages,
allowing the wet paste to grip onto the previously applied
dry sections of paper pulp. When dry, the fill adhered
weakly but acceptably: the bond was strong enough for
the fill to hold in place, but could break open along
the skin-paste interface if stresses were applied, exposing
a thin but noticeable white crack. A weak bond was considered
an advantage, as the fill would fail rather than stress
the skin during RH changes or transportation. One drawback
in the use of this paste was its uneven surface after
drying, which made inpainting difficult; this was partly
overcome by smoothing the surface of the dry fill with
a slurry of paste. Advantages of the paper pulp and
methylcellulose paste include its ease of reversibility,
chemical stability, compressibility, hygroscopicity
similar to that of the skin and absence of a health
hazard. Watercolours or Liquitex acrylic paints were
used to inpaint the fill (see fig. 5).
(2) In two areas, the skins were torn and lifting directly above frame elements; this allowed the frame to be used to back the tears. One tear was 80 cm long and lifted several centimeters from the frame (fig. 2). Small pieces of paper with feathered edges and brushed with adhesive were inserted, using the tear opening, between the skins and the wooden frame. The backed skins were clamped down onto the frame using Parafilm M laboratory film, which was stretched, wound around the kayak and clamped by sticking it to itself or to the oily skin (fig. 3 and 4). The Parafilm worked very well as a clamping mechanism: it gripped well and conformed to the curved shape of the kayak, it distributed tension evenly and it did not slip even if the seal skins were oily. The stretched Parafilm was used either twisted into strong cords or left in wider bands. In some areas, small Styrofoam wedges were used to press the skins in position. After backing, the tears were filled and inpainted as described above in (1); an example of the fill and inpainting during treatment is shown on figure 5.

Figure 1:

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Figure 4:

Figure 5:
(3) In a few areas, the skins were torn and sagging above a frame element a couple of centimeters below. If an insert of some kind could be introduced between the frame element and the skin, it was thought that it could realign the skin by bracing and raising the side of the skin that was too low. The problem was to get the insert in. There was no access, except through the manhole several meters away, or through the tears themselves, approximately 1 cm large at their widest. Fortunately, these were found to be sufficiently large to allow the insertion of a small piece of Ethafoam (fig. 6). Both sides of the skin were not usually fully in plane after insertion, but the overall appearance was improved. Once in plane, the skins were filled and inpainted as described above. The main advantages of this method of realignment were: absence of adhesive, reversibility, simplicity and speed of execution. Because the method depended on the chance occurrence of the frame element below the tears, only four tears could be realigned in this way.
(4) The last method of realignment was used when there was no frame element below the skins to help in the bracing or clamping. Access to the back side of the skins was only through the tears themselves. If a backing was slipped in through the tear, how could it be clamped in place? Our solution was, using magnets in conjonction with a tin-plated spatula4, and only partially backing the skin.
A waxed, tin-plate spatula, on which the backing paper and adhesive were laid, was inserted through a tear and positioned so that part of the tear was backed (fig. 7). A section of the tear equal to the width of the spatula had to be left unbacked to allow the removal of the spatula. The spatula and backing were clamped against the interior of the skin covering with the use of jersey-covered ceramic magnets applied on the exterior of the kayak. This was then left for several days to allow the adhesive to dry. Alternatively, two smaller backings could be placed along each extremities of the tear, as long as a section was left unbacked in the middle of the tear to remove the spatula. Partial backing was not as successful as full backing but the planar distortions were reduced.
A thick Japanese paper, Kurotani heavy #224, was chosen
as a backing material because it is strong yet flexible,
it is fairly compatible with the skin and it has good
handling properties. The backing adhesive was selected
according to these criteria: (1) reversibility; (2)
stability; (3) moderate tensile and peel strength when
adhered to the skin; (4) compatibility with the skin
and the paper pulp filler; (5) flexibility; (6) tack
with minimal penetration into the skin; and (7) minimal
health hazard. After experimentation with Beva 371 and
with solutions of Acryloid B72 modified to increase
flexibility with Klucel G or EHEC of different viscosity
grades5, a solution of 25% w/v Acryloid B72
in ethanol with 15 parts of EHEC of high viscosity grade
was selected.
Conclusion
The repairs took approximately 150 hours to complete, and at least as many hours were spent in consultation, experimentation and in other aspects of the treatment. The kayak is now in climate-controlled storage, wrapped in polyethylene sheeting and resting upside down on a foam padded wooden support. It was examined recently, four years after completing the repairs: the repairs were found to be stable and in the same condition as when they left the Canadian Conservation Institute. The kayak will be eventually displayed in the Canadian Museum of Civilization.
It is hoped that the techniques and materials described will help other conservators devise backing, clamping and realignment techniques for other intricate objects.
Aknowledgments:
The author acknowledges the help of Mary Peever, conservator at the Canadian Conservation Institute, who collaborated in all decisions concerning the extent of treatment and the treatment methods and materials. Other contributors include Thomas Stone, Carl Schlichting, Bob Barclay, Elizabeth Moffatt and Greg Young of CCI; Sandra Lougheed and Susan Maltby, formerly of CCI and now respectively conservator at the Ontario Ministry of Citizenship and Culture and private conservator in Toronto; Katherine Bishop-Glover, curator of the Canadian Museum of Civilization (CMC); and Merle Toole, photographer at the CMC.
Notes
- This article has previously been published by the
author in French as: «La réparation des peaux d'un
kayak», 1989, Proceedings of the 14th Annual
IIC-CG Conference / Actes du 14e Congrès Annuel de
l'IIC-GC, ed. Johanna G. Wellheiser, Toronto
Area Conservation Group of IIC-CG, Ottawa.
- Arima, E.Y., Inuit Kayaks in Canada: A Review
of Historical Records and Construction, 1987,
Canadian Museum of Civilization Mercury Series,
Canadian Ethnology Service Paper No. 110, National
Museums of Canada, Ottawa.
- Hawkes, E.W., The Labrador Eskimo,
1916, Memoir 91, Anthropological Series No. 14, Department
of Mines, Geological Survey, Government Printing Bureau,
Ottawa.
- Magnets and tin-plate were previously used in the
Ethnology laboratory of the Canadian Conservation
Institute as described by Susan Maltby, "Rubber:
the Problem that becomes a Solution", 1988, Modern
Organic Materials, Preprints of the Meeting,
Scottish Society for Conservation and Restoration,
Edinburgh, p. 151-7.
- Vuori, Jan, "A Possible Adhesive for Native
Tanned Skin", Fall 1985, Leather Conservation
News, Vol.2, No.1, p. 6.
Materials and suppliers:
- Acryloid B72 (Rohm and Haas), methyl acrylate / ethyl methacrylate copolymer: Conservation Materials Ltd, 340 Freeport Blvd, Box 2884, Sparks, Nevada 89431, USA, (702) 331-0582.
- BDH methylcellulose low substitution grade, (BDH Chemicals): BDH Chemicals Canada Ltd, 350 Evans Ave., Toronto, Ont., Canada, M8Z 1K5, (416) 255-8521.
- Beva 371 ethylene / vinyl acetate copolymer: Sigmund Haller, Bank of Nova Scotia Chambers, 79 Queen St East, Toronto, Ont. M5C 1R8, Canada, (416) 364-3621.
- EHEC high viscosity grade (Hercules), ethylhydroxyethylcellulose: Hercules Canada Ltd, 56 Aberfoyle Crescent, Toronto, Ont. M8X 2W4, Canada, (416) 232-2946.
- Ethafoam (Dow Chemical Co.), polyethylene foam: Anco Packaging, 85 Malmo Court, P.O. Box 400, Maple, Ont. L0J 1E0, Canada, (416) 832-2276.
- Japanese paper type Kurotani no 224: Aiko's Art Materials Import, 714 N, Wabash Ave., Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA, (312) 943-0745.
- Klucel G(Hercules), hydroxypropylcellulose: Hercules Canada Ltd, 56 Aberfoyle Crescent, Toronto, Ont. M8X 2W4, Canada, (416) 232-2946.
- Liquitex acrylic paints (Binney & Smith Inc.): artist supply shops.
- Paper pulp made of cotton or linen fibres: La Papeterie Saint-Armand, 950 rue Ottawa, Montréal, Qué., Canada, H3C 1S4, (514) 874-4089.
- Parafilm M (American Can Co.): American Can Company, American Lane, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830, USA, (203) 552-2000.
- Styrofoam (Dow Chemical Co.), polystyrene extruded foam plank: craft stores, packaging firms or building materials suppliers.